X-Lines as X-Waves Exhibiting Superluminal Group Wave Velocities; Audio Discussions

This is one article that discusses some of the experimental data that provide evidence of the transmission of superluminal electromagnetic-waveform signals, in laboratory settings [Nimtz and Heibel, 2000: (http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/physics/pdf/0104/0104063v1.pdf)]. I think there's this tendency, on the part of some of the critics of these experiments (I'm not referring to the statements that the authors of the article have made) to assume that it has to be some exotic "thing" that's being sent. In my view, the experimental settings in which superluminal signal transmissions have been demonstrated make use of the same kinds of narrow, "spatially" confined shock zones that you see in binary systems that exhibit "rigid" blueshift jets, for example, that exhibit the sort of jagged, X-wave/X-line type of geometry that is consistent with the geometry of systems in which apparently-unmoving, "scalar" or pseudoscalar group waveforms exist and in which there's indirect evidence that the systems are producing "timelike" displacements in some sort of ongoing manner. I'm still not completely sure if it's that the narrow shock zones produce the kind of "high-contrast-spacetime-phase-transition-boundary-surface" that one sees at the Pacific detonation sites, on the atolls that exhibit jagged geometries and that are shaped like some gravitational wave detectors. In a "two-prism" setup, one is likely to produce a localized heating of the air in the microscopic flaws of the crystal structure of the prism (i.e. interstices of the crystal of the prisms, perhaps near their surfaces) or of the air in between the prisms and produce a spacetime distortion that is in the confined region (that then has to "break out" into other time frames). But I'm still not sure precisely why a narrow region like that is confined, except to say that heating the air in a confined region will produce a "drawing in," in my view, of, as discussed in myvideos and mp3's that I'm going to link to again, more of the replication-inducing waveforms/oscillations that are always converging on and diverging from every object. One would expect this to produce a phase-transition boundary surface or "shell" at the outer edge of the "space" between the prisms and not just at the site at which the beam or em signal crosses between the prisms and is reflected back through one of them [see diagram at top of page in this article: (http://uk.ask.com/wiki/G%C3%BCnter_Nimtz#cite_note-7)]. It's also not at all clear to me that the superluminal waveform has "vanished." A superluminal waveform could reasonably be expected to cease to be visible but to continue propagating. It seems likely that it's just difficult to say "where" it's gone and to what extent the em signal might wind up being blueshifted or redshifted, etc., assuming one could locate it and detect it at some other location (i.e. half a million light years away, etc.).

I had up some audio tracks of discussions I did about physics, but I took them down. I'll try to put some of them back up shortly, here.