Hardcore Physiology Fun II: Use of Spacetime-Phase-Transition-State Oscillations in Neutral-Sheet Corridors in the Lower Mantle and in Lithospheric Slabs of Earth for FTL Transport and Energy Production

I was going to mention that the footage of underground nuclear tests, in particular, imply that the fluid-like rippling of the near-surface rock layers, coupled with the very obvious antigravity effects that are shown in a lot of the footage, does not just mean that the rocks are "fluid-like" but that there is a phase transition that occurs and that permeabilizes the rocks. An implication of this is that the antigravity effects that occur in association with the rippling uplift at each of the single detonation sites could overlap, so as to "lift" up a large region of the Earth and allow one to create navigable, neutral sheet "channels" between slabs of "rock." This could allow one to produce a series of transport pathways through the center of the Earth (between rock layers or enclosed in bubbles, whose surfaces would be defined by phase-transition-boundary surfaces), and this would be something analogous to quantum tunneling but would be occurring on a macro scale. One reason this would be advantageous is that three-dimensional neutral regions in open spacetime, "distant" from a planet or moon or sun, etc., would be expected to be less stable than the rigidly-scaffolded neutral surfaces one could create in a rock-layer-enclosed "neutral corridor," such as one could create by setting up large-scale, oscillatory uplifts that would not be measurable or apparent to someone who would not know to look for correlations in, say, seismic activities on different sides of the Earth, across an interval of 100 years or whatever. From the perspective of any one observer, in any one time frame, the large-scale uplifts would not be observable. Even if one were able to detect some sort of correlation across time frames and among points on the Earth that might be separated by thousands of miles, my sense is that the rippling uplifts and the downwardly-directed "diving" of the slabs of crustal or mantle lithosphere (i.e. tectonic activity) would appear to be occurring very slowly, much as a tsunami with a very long wavelength, as a shallow-water waveform, can be moving at 1,500 mph through the deep ocean but be essentially undetectable to a person on a boat that the tsunami passes beneath.

One of the reasons this type of thing could occur, in my opinion, is that one can view an apparently-stationary object, such as a rock, as being something that is exhibiting group-wave oscillations or a set of oscillatory replication patterns that are almost infinitely rapid (so rapid that the object appears to be impenetrable and utterly unchanging, as in a slab of granite rock). In actuality, rock layers could be said to be more permeable than spacetime, but it's as if the windows between the layered corridors are opening and closing so rapidly as to appear to be nonexistent and to exclude anyone who doesn't have knowledge of the oscillation patterns from using the corridors for transport, within a rock-enclosed, neutral-sheet spacetime manifold. This is disturbing for a number of reasons but is especially disturbing in view of the likelihood that the setting-up of long-time-scale oscillatory "ripples" could be contributing to the melting of the polar ice caps and to the intensification of weather patterns, such as might cause a desert to become even drier or to expand into adjacent, once-fertile land ("desertification"). Obviously, one might try to say that the rocks at an underground nuclear testing site are simply heated and only appear to be moving like a liquid, but it is more likely that one is seeing on a short-term time scale, in the apparent fluidization or liquification of the rocks at a testing site, a phase transition process that is normally occurring in the rocks but that is occurring too rapidly (or, depending on the way one looks at it, too slowly) for one to observe. An example of a phase transition is the melting of ice to produce liquid water, but the key point is that, in my view, in light of all of the evidence, there is going to be a change in the geometry of the spacetime around the water and in the water that drives and that is driven by the melting process. The melting is just a manifestation of a change in the structural organization of the "space" (even the spacetime that makes up the water molecules themselves). It's as if the rock is still solid, during its rippling and rolling oscillations at a detonation site, but it's as if the covalent bonds between the atoms in the rocks have been transiently broken and then reformed. More precisely, it's as if the noncovalent contributions to the maintenance of the rocks' crystal packing geometries, such as could be defined as being some type of weaker, interatomic bonding (like the hydrogen bonds between water molecules that are broken in the ice-to-water phase transition), have been disrupted, transiently. Anyway, my view is that the rocks' extended spacetime geometries are not what one would expect and that the rocks are, in essence, always replicating and changing along very dynamic pathways or geometries. Essentially, my view is that the replication of rock structures occurs in a manner that is as much ocean-wave-like as the dynamics of the replication of water or anything else occurs along, but the ripples are occurring much more rapidly than one could normally perceive and that the "replicative ripples" are more spread-out across multiple time frames than the replication of something like ocean-surface water is. It would be like seeing tiny sections of the surface of the ocean, from an altitude of 2,000 feet or something, and concluding that the ocean is a rigid, impenetrable, unchanging surface, like a rock surface. In reality, the rock is likely to not be quiescent at all (not likely to be replicating "slowly"). Using the organized patterns of uplift for transport would be analogous to surfing along the "cylindrical" corridor of a wave, near the shoreline, etc., except the corridor would be likely to follow much more circuitous pathways, etc.

[Links to Operation Teapot image, an image in the public domain: (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/04/Operation_Teapot_-_Ess.jpg); (http://www.nv.doe.gov/library/PhotoLibrary/55-027.jpg)]