This is a link to the soundtrack to Fat Man and Little Boy, about the Manhattan Project (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KepAujDpPCs). The music is sad, and the movie also gets at some of the deep sadness of it. It gets to be almost vulgar to discuss and express my feelings about this on a blog, and I really can't do it anymore. If anyone ever wants to discuss it with me and remain open-minded, I'm always capable of doing so. But it's probably not too fun to talk about it with me, these days. I have some strong feelings and opinions about it, and I consider my thoughts and feelings about nuclear physics to be a deeply private thing, for the most part. I can always, temporarily, focus on the technical aspects of the topics, but I can't simply put aside my feelings about the subject of time travel and of the annihilation of event-associated geometries by nuclear detonations and by the "overlapping" or superposition of multiple nuclear detonations.
In my opinion, nuclear detonations annihilate and reorganize the past and future selves of people and the events in their lives, in a largely random way. Anyone whom this happened to would never realize that it had happened, and neither would anyone, affected by the reorganization, remember that the people had ever lived or that the events had ever occurred. In my opinion, the effects of nuclear detonations on spacetime have been used for time travel, though I don't really know precisely who did this. In my view, it wasn't necessarily anyone in any position in any legitimate government position who ever did this, but, in my opinion, nuclear detonations were used in primitive approaches to time travel and interstellar transport. I'm sure no one's messing around with such primitive strategies anymore. Additionally, in my opinion, one could approach time travel, from a crude, mechanistic standpoint, by using a modified set of nuclear reactors, linked to neutron-scattering and neutron-lensing crystals of some kind, to allow for superposition with and access to the nuclear detonations' "atemporal," invariant geometries [(http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=neutron+lensing+reactor&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_ylo=&as_vis=0)]. Nuclear detonations produce dramatic, albeit transient, antigravity effects [not the best example, but apparent, beginning 22 seconds into the video: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ham8X4s92k)] and also produce gravitational waves in the Earth's atmosphere and magnetosphere [(http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962JAtS...19..256P); (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=gravitational+waves+nuclear+test+atmosphere+OR+magnetosphere&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_ylo=&as_vis=0); (http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?db_key=AST&bibcode=1964IAUS...18...47O&letter=0&classic=YES&defaultprint=YES&whole_paper=YES&page=47&epage=47&send=Send+PDF&filetype=.pdf)(http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1964IAUS...18...47O); (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MAP....85...47K)], and a sophisticated neutron lensing device could be viewed as being a gravitational microlens or something, if one wants to get into the business of labeling things like that. I don't think it would even be all that difficult to do in a crude way, but you'd probably need to create some kind of uranium-doped fullerene matrix or set up a supercooled "reactor" along with a warm one, etc. I don't have the energy to blab about all of the stuff that relates to this crap, but the main thing is that you wouldn't think of it as being a reactor but as a neutron lensing device that would contain some sort of atypical patterns of distribution of both the neutron sources (i.e. the uranium or plutonium 'fuel' and the polonium-and-beryllium-based initiator-like neutron source or "beam") and the substances that produce the scattering, lensing, and/or absorption of slow, thermal neutrons, fast neutrons, and ultracold neutrons, etc. Again, this would be a very primitive type of approach.
Anyway, it gets to be pretty sad to write about this, and I can't really do it anymore.
In my opinion, nuclear detonations annihilate and reorganize the past and future selves of people and the events in their lives, in a largely random way. Anyone whom this happened to would never realize that it had happened, and neither would anyone, affected by the reorganization, remember that the people had ever lived or that the events had ever occurred. In my opinion, the effects of nuclear detonations on spacetime have been used for time travel, though I don't really know precisely who did this. In my view, it wasn't necessarily anyone in any position in any legitimate government position who ever did this, but, in my opinion, nuclear detonations were used in primitive approaches to time travel and interstellar transport. I'm sure no one's messing around with such primitive strategies anymore. Additionally, in my opinion, one could approach time travel, from a crude, mechanistic standpoint, by using a modified set of nuclear reactors, linked to neutron-scattering and neutron-lensing crystals of some kind, to allow for superposition with and access to the nuclear detonations' "atemporal," invariant geometries [(http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=neutron+lensing+reactor&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_ylo=&as_vis=0)]. Nuclear detonations produce dramatic, albeit transient, antigravity effects [not the best example, but apparent, beginning 22 seconds into the video: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ham8X4s92k)] and also produce gravitational waves in the Earth's atmosphere and magnetosphere [(http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1962JAtS...19..256P); (http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=gravitational+waves+nuclear+test+atmosphere+OR+magnetosphere&btnG=Search&as_sdt=0%2C24&as_ylo=&as_vis=0); (http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?db_key=AST&bibcode=1964IAUS...18...47O&letter=0&classic=YES&defaultprint=YES&whole_paper=YES&page=47&epage=47&send=Send+PDF&filetype=.pdf)(http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1964IAUS...18...47O); (http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MAP....85...47K)], and a sophisticated neutron lensing device could be viewed as being a gravitational microlens or something, if one wants to get into the business of labeling things like that. I don't think it would even be all that difficult to do in a crude way, but you'd probably need to create some kind of uranium-doped fullerene matrix or set up a supercooled "reactor" along with a warm one, etc. I don't have the energy to blab about all of the stuff that relates to this crap, but the main thing is that you wouldn't think of it as being a reactor but as a neutron lensing device that would contain some sort of atypical patterns of distribution of both the neutron sources (i.e. the uranium or plutonium 'fuel' and the polonium-and-beryllium-based initiator-like neutron source or "beam") and the substances that produce the scattering, lensing, and/or absorption of slow, thermal neutrons, fast neutrons, and ultracold neutrons, etc. Again, this would be a very primitive type of approach.
Anyway, it gets to be pretty sad to write about this, and I can't really do it anymore.
No comments:
Post a Comment